Aggression: Sibling Rivalry
What is a dominance hierarchy and why is it important
to dogs?
Dogs are social animals whose evolutionary history
makes them willing and able to live in groups. Group living enabled wolves to
work together to obtain food, raise their young and defend their territory. It
would be counterproductive for members of a group to fight with each other and
risk injury. That would prevent them from working with the group. Therefore,
dogs have a social structure in which each dog is either dominant (leader) or
subordinate in its relationship with each other pack member. This is a
"dominance hierarchy". The leader or "alpha" dog is the one
that has first access to all the "critical" resources. These resources
include food, resting places, mates, territory and favored possessions.
Assertion of dominance by the alpha is generally communicated through facial
expressions, body postures and actions. Fighting is rare, since as soon as the
subordinate submits or defers to the alpha animal and the alpha gets its way, he
or she gives up the challenge.
My dogs have lived together for some time and now they
are fighting. Why?
Fights between dogs in the household are often about
dominance or social status. Social status aggression most often occurs when dogs
reach social maturity at 12-36 months of age. Fights will be about those
resources that are considered important to dogs. Therefore fights may occur over
treats, owner attention, greeting the owner upon return, sleeping positions near
the owner, entering or exiting the home, high arousal situations such as fence
running, or movement through tight spaces. These fights occur most often between
dogs of near equal status and often, but not always, dogs of the same sex, and
seem to be most severe between female dogs.
I try to treat my dogs equally, but they still fight.
What am I doing wrong?
Trying to treat two dogs as equals will only serve to
counter the natural tendency toward a hierarchy. The dog that is the more
dominant in a relationship needs to be supported in its position and the more
subordinate must be taught to accept the relationship. When you support or
encourage the subordinate dog as it tries to gain access to resources such as
your attention, the dominant dog may begin to challenge and fight, in an effort
to keep the lower ranking dog in its " place". If you then discipline
the dominant dog, or pull the dominant dog away, you have favored, supported and
come to the aid of the subordinate dog.
Both my dogs are the same age, and after a third, older
dog died, they began to fight — why?
Conflicts may occur between dogs when the dominance
status is ambiguous or when they are particularly close in rank. After the
decline, illness or death of an older dog, fighting may begin in the remaining
dogs even when one is clearly dominant. This is because the older dog may have
been dominant to both dogs, and now they are trying to establish new positions.
In any case the fighting can be severe and injurious. Although you should
generally attempt to allow dogs to resolve their differences on their own you
will need to intervene if there is the potential for injury. Under no
circumstances should the dogs be allowed to "fight it out". However,
you could be injured due to redirected aggressive attacks, or when you attempt
to break up the fight (see below).
My younger dog always deferred to the older dog, but
now they fight.
One scenario that can result in social aggression is
when an older, previously dominant dog, is challenged by a younger, more
domineering dog. This may happen as the older dog ages, or as the younger dog
reaches behavioral maturity at 12 to 36 months. This is often clearly an attempt
to alter the existing hierarchy. Sometimes the older dog will acquiesce and
things are fine but at other times the owners do not want the change and
intervene. In some situations, the older dog will not relinquish the dominant
role even though it cannot physically compete with the younger dog. This can
result in severe, injurious fights.
How should I break up fighting if it occurs?
This can be a dangerous situation for people and dogs
alike. Owners usually try to reach for the collar of the fighting dogs, or if
one is small, pick it up. This can result in severe owner injury if the fighting
is very intense. If both are wearing leashes they can usually be pulled apart.
If all else fails, you might be able to break up the fight with a water rifle,
broom, or another distraction (such as pepper spray or a fire extinguisher).
Reaching for the dog is usually the worst thing to do, as you could be injured
(either accidentally or intentionally).
When people intervene in dog fights, redirected
aggression is possible. Aggression (growl, snarl or bite) can be redirected to a
person, animal or object other than that which evoked the aggression. If during
the course of a dog fight, you pick up one of the dogs, the other may continue
to attack and direct it at you.
What should I do when one of my dogs challenges
another?
Aggression between household dogs can be difficult to
treat. You will need to identify the subordinate dog, and ensure that you are
not encouraging the subordinate dog to challenge the more dominant. It is
critical that you never come to the aid of the subordinate against the more
dominant. If left alone, the dogs will often use posturing and threats to end
encounters without injury. If one dog backs down, the problem may be resolved.
However, when neither dog is willing to give up the dominant position (as in a
young dog challenging an older dog in the home), fighting will usually result.
A common owner error is the desire to make life
"fair". This often results in owners allowing subordinate dogs access
to resources, such as attention, treats, toys, or entry into territory that they
would not normally have. Usually the subordinate dog would not behave in a
manner that would challenge the dominant when no one is around to
"protect" it. If you encourage or protect the subordinate dog, it may
be "tempted" to break the "rules", and the dominant dog may
become aggressive to enforce the "rules". If you then punish the
dominant dog for aggression, the subordinate dog learns it can engage in
prohibited behavior while the owner is present. This is why, in many households,
there is no fighting when the owners are gone. The subordinate is aware of the
hierarchy, and does nothing to challenge the dominant dog, unless the owners are
around to intervene.
How can I treat this problem?
Although the dominance relationship between the two
dogs must be dealt with, the first step is for the owner to gain complete
control over both dogs. As leader or alpha your presence and commands should be
sufficient to prevent all dominance challenges between dogs and to intervene as
needed when threats emerge. Control of each dog is achieved through the use of
verbal commands, by leaving a leash and head halter attached for immediate
control, and by withholding all rewards unless earned. Attention on demand not
only encourages situations where one dog may challenge the other, but also
allows your dogs to control you. Inattention on demand teaches the dogs that all
rewards are provided only when you choose, and reduces or eliminates those
situations where challenges might occur. Head halter with leash control and
obedience-reward based training of each dog should first be done separately.
With a head halter and remote leash on each dog you will have effective control,
and a means of controlling and separating the dogs if needed. With control of
the head and mouth, aggressive threats can be curtailed and either dog can be
placed in a subordinate posture, by pulling up on the leash, closing the mouth,
looking the dog in the eyes, or pulling the head sideways so that the dog’s
gaze is averted.
Next, treatment must be designed to identify and
support the dominant dog. In most cases this is the younger, larger, more
physically capable dog. Often, this is also the aggressor. You must allow the
dominant dog priority to go outside, to come in, or to receive food or owner
attention and affection. If you are petting the dominant dog and the subordinate
dog approaches, make it wait. Avoid all circumstances that elicit aggression. If
the more dominant dog approaches or challenges the subordinate dog and the
subordinate dog assumes a subordinate posture, the owners are not to intervene
as long as the dominant dogs stop. If the dogs are likely to fight when you are
away or at homecomings, separate the dogs whenever you are out, or are not
available to supervise.
On other occasions, neither dog is willing to be
subordinate. This could be due to a challenge to the hierarchy as a younger dog
matures, as an older dog becomes sick or aged, when a new dog is introduced into
the home, or when one dog is not clearly dominant to the other. You should learn
how to recognize canine body language and low level threats such as eye contact,
snarls or low growls. Keep records of threats, attacks, or tension producing
situations. An owner must have excellent control over both dogs in order to
succeed. To facilitate treatment, decrease the chances of injuries and increase
owner control, a remote leash can be left attached to one or both dogs. Often
the best form of owner control is to fit and train each dog with a head halter,
and to leave a leash and head halter on each dog when they are together (under
the owner’s supervision).
Once you have gained sufficient control over both dogs,
and have identified the more dominant, you will need to deal with the
circumstances that might elicit aggression. Greetings should be low key, and
both dogs should be ignored. Treats are avoided and rawhides or other delicious
things are not given unless the dogs are separated or on leash. Movement through
tight spaces is avoided or controlled. You must be present to ensure that the
dominant dog gains preferential access to food, resting places, territory, owner
attention and treats. Commands and rewards or the leash and halter can be used
to ensure that the subordinate does not challenge, and that the dominant does
not continue to show aggression once the subordinate submits. Getting the dogs
together without incident can best be accomplished when the dogs are otherwise
occupied and when a confrontation is unlikely, such as during walks or feeding.
It is usually best to have two individuals to walk the dogs (each person
controls one dog) and not to allow them to forge in front of one another. During
feeding, keep the dogs at a distance, far enough apart that they do not show
aggression. Slowly the dishes are moved closer together as long as the dogs do
not react. The food serves as a reward in this situation. If the dogs react, the
food bowls are moved further apart. When the owner is not home or supervising
the dogs, the dogs are separated or crated.
Basket muzzles could be left on each dog to increase
safety while the dogs are together. They can also be used to "proof"
the training, by putting the dogs together in situations that previously led to
aggression. Drug therapy for one or both dogs may also be useful.
Can social aggression always be corrected?
At times aggression may persist despite owner control
and intervention. In those cases alternate living arrangements for one of the
animals may need to be made.